Otto Virtanen vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
O. Virtanen vs B. Van De Zandschulp

FIN
1
Win
Played
2
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Virtanen 1 - 2 Zandschulp
They have played 6 sets in total, with Otto Virtanen winning 2 and Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 4. The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Otto Virtanen was at the Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha, 16-02-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Virtanen | 1 |
| Zandschulp | 2 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha(02-16-25)
(Rubber 1) Davis Cup, Group D, Split(09-12-23)
(R1) Ostrava Challenger(08-31-20)
O. Virtanen vs B. V. D. Zandschulp H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $598,700 | Career Prize Money | $3,738,275 |
| 58.73% (232-163) | Career Total W/L | 60.83% (382-246) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 11 | Titles | 7 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 36.36% (4-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 43.24% (16-21) |
O. Virtanen vs B. V. D. Zandschulp Match Preview:
Predictions for the Upcoming Tennis Match
- Recent Form Analysis: Second Serve Performance
- Recent Form Analysis: Return Game Statistics
- Under Pressure Analysis
- Performance Overview
- Best Surface Analysis
- Level of Play
- Direct Head-to-Head Matches
- Duration of Head-to-Head Matches
- Deciding Set Prediction
- Head-to-Head Pressure Situations
- Opponent Quality Analysis
- Deciding Set Performance against All Players
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics
- Break Point Conversion
- If you wish to explore models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. Please be advised that it predominantly caters to statistics enthusiasts.
In the past six months, Zandschulp has exhibited a second serve success rate of 47.46%, while Virtanen has achieved a slightly higher rate of 49.58%. It is worth noting that there exists a substantial correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
Examining their recent form, Zandschulp has proven victorious in securing 51.62% of their opponent's second serve points, slightly edging out Virtanen who has accomplished a success rate of 51.04%. When focusing on first serve returns, Zandschulp has achieved a rate of 27.48%, whereas Virtanen has attained a slightly lower rate of 26.23%. These statistics hold significant influence in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
When faced with high-pressure situations, Zandschulp has demonstrated the ability to save 62.01% of breakpoints during his recent form. In comparison, Virtanen has showcased a respectable 60.61% saving rate. This statistical metric is particularly useful when making in-game betting predictions.
Over the course of the previous year, Zandschulp has secured victory in 48.44% of matches played, boasting a win-loss record of 31/33. On the other hand, Virtanen has achieved a higher success rate of 58.82%, with a win-loss record of 40/28. Considering the head-to-head comparison, these performance figures provide an informative overview for match predictions.
When analyzing Zandschulp's career surface win percentages, it is evident that their most successful surface is indoor hardcourts, with a 63% win rate (93 wins and 54 losses). Conversely, their least successful surface is grass courts, where they have achieved a win rate of 46% (11 wins and 13 losses). In comparison, Virtanen excels on indoor hardcourts, attaining a win rate of 70% (120 wins and 51 losses), while struggling on clay courts with a win rate of 46% (44 wins and 52 losses).
Considering the past year, Zandschulp has primarily competed on the main tour, winning 41.67% of matches (10 wins and 14 losses). In contrast, Virtanen has mainly participated in Challenger/ITF tournaments with a prize pool above $10K, achieving an impressive win rate of 69.7% (23 wins and 10 losses). It is essential to acknowledge that when determining the favorite player, these statistics are relative to the level of events each player has been engaging in.
In their previous encounters, Zandschulp and Virtanen have faced each other twice, resulting in one victory for each player. Remarkably, both players have captured two sets, creating an equal standing in terms of sets won. The most recent encounter occurred at the Davis Cup, Group D, Split, on 12-09-2023, where Otto Virtanen emerged triumphant with a 7-6(0) 6-4 victory.
In previous head-to-head matches, the average duration of matches between Zandschulp and Virtanen has been recorded at 1 hour, 20 minutes, and 39 seconds.
Throughout their history, Zandschulp and Virtanen have not encountered a deciding set thus far. Consequently, there is no data available to predict their performance in such scenarios.
Having played one tiebreak against each other, Zandschulp has yet to secure a victory in tiebreak situations, while Virtanen has triumphed once.
During the past 12 months, Zandschulp has confronted opponents with an average ranking of 119.13, whereas Virtanen has faced adversaries with an average ranking of 235.07. These figures shed light on the level of competition each player has encountered.
In the context of deciding sets, Zandschulp has been successful in winning 43% of matches over the previous 12 months. In contrast, Virtanen has achieved a higher success rate, winning 57% of all matches played on the tour. These statistics present valuable insights for live predictions and betting if this particular match enters a deciding set.
While previous player performances serve as a significant factor in forecasting tennis matches, it becomes essential to assess current event statistics once a competition is underway. The section below provides a comprehensive overview of the in-form players in the current event. Additionally, it is worth recognizing that certain players excel more prominently in specific events, which should be considered when predicting the match outcome.
In recent matches, Zandschulp has demonstrated a proficient breakpoint conversion rate, successfully capitalizing on 40.85% of opportunities. Conversely, Virtanen has converted 33.72% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These statistics hold significant value for in-game live betting tips, especially when either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
Otto Virtanen vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
O. Virtanen vs B. V. D. Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 27 | Games Won | 35 |
| 19 | Aces (Total) | 19 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:11:41 | Average Match Time | 1:11:41 |
| 66% (111/167) | 1st Serve % | 68% (121/178) |
| 77% (85/111) | 1st Serve Win % | 81% (98/121) |
| 52% (29/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (34/57) |
| 20% (2/10) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (6/10) |
| 26% (46/178) | Return Points Win % | 32% (53/167) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
O. Virtanen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | ||
F | L | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
SF | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
Q1 | W | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(5) 6-7(7) 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||

O. Virtanen vs B. V. D. Zandschulp Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.73% (232/163) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.83% (382/246) |
| 56.98% (535/404) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.84% (874/637) |
| 51.95% (4727/4372) | Games Win/Loss | 52.97% (7595/6742) |
| 43.10% (25/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.81% (74/54) |
| 44.95% (49/60) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.59% (178/111) |
| 69.39% (136/60) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64.13% (118/66) |
| 68.75% (22/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 44.44% (12/15) |
| 0.66 | Aces Per Game | 0.45 |
| 2935 | Aces Total | 3139 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1291 | Total Double Faults | 2297 |
| 1:31:5 | Average Match Time | 1:36:56 |
| 403.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 394.63 |
| 59% (16242/27433) | 1st Serve % | 62% (25788/41885) |
| 73% (11881/16242) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (18493/25788) |
| 50% (5540/11190) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7758/16100) |
| 39% (1031/2620) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1881/4385) |
| 38% (10513/27678) | Return Points Win % | 40% (17540/43322) |
| 60.00% (18/12) | Slam W/L | 58.93% (33/23) |
| 33.33% (4/8) | Masters W/L | 48.21% (27/29) |
| 44.44% (8/10) | Cups W/L | 60.00% (12/8) |
| 38.24% (13/21) | Main Tour W/L | 51.30% (79/75) |
| 60.57% (106/69) | Challenger W/L | 63.33% (76/44) |
| 65.87% (83/43) | Futures W/L | 69.82% (155/67) |
| 59% (226/380) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (354/572) |
| 30% (3/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 49% (21/43) |
| 56% (90/162) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (108/205) |
| 52% (72/138) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (117/206) |
| 84% (230/194) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (359/319) |
| 15% (230/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (359/39) |
| 22% (165/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (267/62) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Prizmic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
